TOWARDS APPRAISAL AND IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EGYPTIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Project Management has evolved and emerged by several organizations not only to gain competitive advantage; but also as a crucial factor that determines the success of the organization. In this regard, there is a global growing interest and attention for organizations to evaluate and improve the level of their project management practices. The past decade has shown a dramatic increase in the attention, research and practice of the project management maturity and the maturity models. These models are used to evaluate the current project management capabilities of an organization and to ensure its efficiency and uniformity in delivering projects successfully. Moreover, these models are used to further enhance the performance of organizations. Although the maturity models has evolved during the last decade as one of the tools for achieving project management excellence on the organization level; however, the excessive variety of maturity models has made the choice between those models difficult and need careful attention and consideration in both the model choice and its practical implementation in the business. For developed countries (such as USA, Canada, UK, Europe, etc…) several maturity models have been proposed and commonly implemented successfully. In Egypt, there is a lack of documentation available on the current status and use of maturity models in the contracting organizations working in the construction industry. This paper constitutes a part of a larger research project aims to fill this gap. To achieve this, an extensive literature review has been conducted on the predominant existing maturity models, a market survey to assess the current status of maturity awareness in the construction contracting organizations has been developed and the basis of integrated framework for appraisal and improvement of project management practices for the contracting organizations working in the Egyptian construction industry have been proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it