MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900537105 · doi:10.1186/s13660-018-1899-0

General iterative methods for systems of variational inequalities with the constraints of generalized mixed equilibria and fixed point problem of pseudocontractions

2018· article· en· W2900537105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inequalities and Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersShanghai Municipal Education CommissionMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsMathematicsVariational inequalityFixed pointHilbert spaceConvergence (economics)Iterative methodApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce two general iterative methods (one implicit method and one explicit method) for finding a solution of a general system of variational inequalities (GSVI) with the constraints of finitely many generalized mixed equilibrium problems and a fixed point problem of a continuous pseudocontractive mapping in a Hilbert space. Then we establish strong convergence of the proposed implicit and explicit iterative methods to a solution of the GSVI with the above constraints, which is the unique solution of a certain variational inequality. The results presented in this paper improve, extend, and develop the corresponding results in the earlier and recent literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it