MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900551243 · doi:10.36216/jpd.v2i1.13

Impending krisis tiroid pada struma multinodusa toksik dengan pneumonia komunitas

2018· article· id· W2900551243 on OpenAlexaff
Indra Permana

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Penyakit Dalam Udayana · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Health and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsVictoria General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hipertiroidisme yang berlanjut menjadi krisis tiroid merupakan salah satu komplikasi yang jarang ditemui. Berbagai faktor dapat mencetuskan krisis tiroid pada tirotoksikosis seperti trauma, pembedahan, emboli paru, infark miokard, gangguan serebrovaskular, infeksi, ketoasidosis diabetikum, toksemia gravidarum, dan ketidakpatuhan mengkonsumsi obat anti tiroid. Angka mortalitas yang tinggi menyebabkan penanganan pada kasus ini harus cepat dan tepat, penyebab kematian tersering pada krisis tiroid ialah kegagalan sistem kardiopulmonal. Apabila mendapat penanganan lebih awal maka angka mortalitas dapat dikurangi, oleh karena itu akan dipresentasikan sebuah kasus seorang perempuan usia 58 tahun dengan struma multinodusa yang mengalami impending krisis tiroid dengan faktor pemicu infeksi pneumonia komunitas. Penilaian dengan skor Burch Wartofsky didapatkan nilai 40, yang menunjukkan kecurigaan akan terjadinya impending krisis tiroid, faktor pencetusnya kemudian ditangani dengan pemberian antibiotika, kemudian untuk kondisi tirotoksikosisnya ditangani dengan pemberian obat anti tiroid, antipiretik, beta bloker dan glukokortikoid, setelah menjalani perawatan, kondisi pasien membaik dan diperbolehkan pulang.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Penyakit Dalam UdayanaSame topicAdolescent Health and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207