MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transition to Parenthood and Relationship Satisfaction

2016· other· en· W2900553696 on OpenAlexaff
Geneviève Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Family Studies · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyTransition (genetics)Longitudinal studyDemographySocial psychologyMedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The transition to parenthood within a family begins with the first pregnancy and continues until the child is approximately two years of age. Historically, the birth of a first child has been described as a crisis for the couple, and researchers still see it as one of the most difficult stages of the family life cycle. Both cross‐sectional and longitudinal research show that, for most new parents and particularly for mothers, the birth of a first child is associated with a significant, small‐ to moderate‐sized decline in relationship satisfaction. Many researchers have shown that the decrease in relationship satisfaction associated with the transition to parenthood is greater than what is observed for the same period of time among childless couples. However, the probability of divorce or separation is generally lower among couples who have recently become parents than among other couples. Current research focuses on the conditions associated with an easier transition to parenthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Family StudiesSame topicFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFrench-language works237,207