MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2900597784 · doi:10.4095/296955

Landslides and railways in the Thompson River Valley, British Columbia

2015· report· en· W2900597784 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Huntley

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandslideRiver valleyGeographyArchaeologyGeologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Landslides in the mountain valleys of western Canada have challenged the development and operation of railways since the late 19th Century. In the 21st Century, pronounced economic and environmental repercussions occur when rail service is disrupted by landslide activity. In the section of the Canadian National and Canadian Pacific railway corridor that runs through the Thompson River valley in southern British Columbia there is a unique combination of complex glacial geology and active slope processes. To better understand and manage geological hazards and risks along this section of the transportation corridor, a small slow-moving landslide that is adversely impacting critical railway infrastructure and operation is now under collaborative investigation by the national railway companies, federal government agencies and universities through the Railway Ground Hazard Research Program http://www.carrl.ca/RGHRP. Radar satellite imagery, global positioning, borehole monitoring, fiber optical measurement of slope deformation, geological mapping, geophysical surveys and field observations provide information on the distribution of earth materials, landforms and deformation processes involved in the landslide. All techniques confirm movement across the main landslide body, with the greatest displacement at the south end in the vicinity of a lock-block retaining wall. Mapping and geophysical surveys indicate a high relief bedrock surface overlain by up to 80 metres of clay, till and gravel with saline groundwater in the main body and landslide toe. Planar sub-surface features revealed in geophysical profiles include tabular bedding and earth material contacts. Profiles also show discrete curvilinear features interpreted as retrogressive translational failure planes in clay-rich layers beneath the retaining wall and rail ballast that extend below the Thompson River. Innovative research and development at this site provides national railway companies, governments and local communities with better information to predict landslide movement and reduce risks to the environment, economy, natural resources and public safety. The painting is a southward view of the Thompson River valley showing bedrock, glacial deposits, scattered boulders, landslide scarps, radar satellite monitoring prisms and global positioning stations flanking the rail tracks and retaining wall at the Ripley Landslide, near Ashcroft in south-central British Columbia. About the artist: Dr. David Huntley is a research scientist with the Geological Survey of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→