MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900619725 · doi:10.15210/norus.v6i9.13738

Etnografía, Teoría Fundamentada y Frónesis: La Relevancia del Contexto

2018· article· es· W2900619725 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Castleton

Bibliographic record

VenueNovos Rumos Sociológicos · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American socio-political dynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo discutiré la relevancia del contexto para entender lo social. Sostengo que al reducir la realidad social a modelos estructurados, cerrados y predictivos, las posibilidades de comprender la vida humana se ven severamente restringidas. Baso esta idea en las nociones del sociólogo danés Bent Flybvjerg sobre el rol del término arsistotélico frónesis en la investigación sociológica. Trataré, además, de establecer como la frónesis es útil para enfoques cualitativos claves como la teoría fundamentada y la etnografía. Finalmente presentaré un ejemplo de trabajo empírico desarrollado dentro de dos fábricas de una empresa de productos lácteos en Uruguay (CASTLETON 2017).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.011
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovos Rumos SociológicosSame topicLatin American socio-political dynamicsFrench-language works237,207