MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900640158 · doi:10.3917/ds.424.0643

Les musées de prison au Canada : une réflexion abolitionniste

2018· article· fr· W2900640158 on OpenAlexaffabout
Justin Piché, Kevin Walby

Bibliographic record

VenueDéviance et Société · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePrisonArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Des anciennes prisons transformées en musées sont répandues à travers le monde. Ces musées peuvent-ils alimenter le projet abolitionniste ou, à l’inverse, faire obstacle au démantèlement du système carcéral ? À partir d’une étude portant sur 45 musées de prison au Canada, cet article démontre que, dans la majorité des cas, ces sites réaffirment les définition étatiques, juridiques et populaires de ce qui constitue un « crime », diabolisent les « criminels » de manière qui sert à justifier leur criminalisation et leur captivité et avancent l’idée que la justice punitive est une réaction sociale appropriée suivant des préjudices qui sont actuellement criminalisés et punis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDéviance et SociétéSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207