Insight into the chromophore of rhodopsin and its Meta-II photointermediate by<sup>19</sup>F solid-state NMR and chemical shift tensor calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
19F nuclei are useful labels in solid-state NMR studies, since their chemical shift and tensor elements are very sensitive to the electrostatic and space-filling properties of their local environment. In this study we have exploited a fluorine substituent, strategically placed at the C-12-position of 11-cis retinal, the chromophore of visual rhodopsins. This label was used to explore the local environment of the chromophore in the ground state of bovine rhodopsin and its active photo-intermediate Meta II. In addition, the chemical shift and tensor elements of the chromophore in the free state in a membrane environment and the bound state in the protein were determined. Upon binding of the chromophore into rhodopsin and Meta II, the isotropic chemical shift changes in the opposite direction by +9.7 and -8.4 ppm, respectively. An unusually large isotropic shift difference of 35.9 ppm was observed between rhodopsin and Meta II. This partly originates in the light-triggered 11-cis to all-trans isomerization of the chromophore. The other part reflects the local conformational rearrangements in the chromophore and the binding pocket. These NMR data were correlated with the available X-ray structures of rhodopsin and Meta II using bond polarization theory. For this purpose hydrogen atoms have to be inserted and hereto a family of structures were derived that best correlated with the well-established 13C chemical shifts. Based upon these structures, a 12-F derivative was obtained that best corresponded with the experimentally determined 19F chemical shifts and tensor elements. The combined data indicate strong changes in the local environment of the C-12 position and a substantially different interaction pattern with the protein in Meta II as compared to rhodopsin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".