MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900729308 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-02/1/4

Atomic Layer Deposition of ORR Catalysts for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries

2018· article· en· W2900729308 on OpenAlexaff
M.P. Clark, Ken Cadien, Douglas G. Ivey

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic layer depositionMaterials scienceElectrolyteBattery (electricity)ElectrodeCatalysisChemical engineeringEnergy storageZincOxygen evolutionZincateCathodeAnodeInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)ChemistryElectrochemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The move towards cleaner and renewal energy production, such as solar and wind power, necessitates the development of efficient, safe and cost effective energy storage methods. Zinc-air batteries (ZABs) are prime candidates to meet these requirements and store large amounts of electricity. They use oxygen in the atmosphere as the cathode reactant in the discharge process. Oxygen diffuses into the cell and is reduced to hydroxyl ions in the presence of a catalyst at the air electrode (oxygen reduction reaction or ORR). At the same time, the zinc electrode is oxidized and dissolves in the electrolyte, producing zincate ions. During recharging, zinc metal is reduced from zincate ions and plated at the zinc electrode. Oxygen evolution (OER) occurs at the air electrode. There are challenges in implementing zinc-air batteries for large scale energy storage. The ORR and OER processes at the air electrode are sluggish and electrode stability can be poor because of catalyst delamination and/or substrate corrosion during battery cycling. Effective electrodes for ZABs require a catalyst that is efficient, stable and electrochemically active. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a gas phase deposition technique capable of fabricating thin films from a wide variety of materials. ALD utilizes alternating pulses of reactants that each undergo self-limiting reactions on the sample surface, producing uniform and conformal films, with good composition control and sub-nanometer thickness control. These features of ALD are particularly attractive for fabricating ORR catalysts in zinc-air battery electrodes, as they can lead to increased surface areas and three-phase boundary areas, both of which should lead to better performance and cyclability. In this study, ALD is used to produce air electrodes with Mn oxide as the ORR catalyst. The process is optimized and deposits are characterized using microstructural characterization (e.g., electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, surface science techniques and Raman spectroscopy) and electrochemical characterization (e.g., linear sweep voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and galvanostatic cycling) methods. Successful materials are tested in two different battery configurations, i.e., a two electrode set-up and a three-electrode set-up where the ORR and OER reactions are decoupled. The three-electrode configuration limits the potential window to which each electrode is subjected, greatly improving stability and cyclability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207