MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900782507 · doi:10.4095/295580

Guide de production d'imagerie sonar à l'aide d'outils grand public - Étude de cas à la rivière des Outaouais à Quyon, Québec

2014· report· en· W2900782507 on OpenAlexaffabout
C Prévost

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) has the mandate of providing essential geographic information. An improved knowledge of our physical environment represents one of the basis of this mandate. This essential baseline information is generally associated with the terrestrial or landmass environment. The geographic knowledge of the underwater environment often represents the weak segment in the chain linking terrestrial units together. In the geohazard domain, also a NRCAN mandate, the development of mitigation strategies for geohazards, including landslide, rely on accurate underwater terrain information. Recently, there have been consumer grade, low cost, side scan imaging sonars capable of imaging the floor of a lake, a river or a coastline. These tools are targeted for sport fishing and diving markets but they are also capable of partly providing an image view of the lake and river floor. These tools, which are versatile, portable and easy to use can have scientific and technological applications, such as the subsurface geomorphological mapping of lake and river floors: bedrock outline, contact between sediments and bedrock, lineaments, sand waves location and various forms of erosion / deposit. Therefore, low cost consumer grade side scan sonars can partly fill the technology / scientific information gap for essential geographic information and geohazards, and are particularly well suited for the Canadian North and in remote or difficult to access areas. A case study was carried out in Quyon Qc. area, in the Ottawa region, to determine the potential of these tools for the geomorphological mapping of a river floor, as it may relate to landslide characterization in the area. This document explains the main constraints for a high quality survey and recommends ways to overcome them. Several image examples and interpretation are presented as well as the findings resulting from this case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1220.064

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207