MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900803599 · doi:10.1039/c8ra08657e

A one-step synthesis of rare-earth phosphate–borosilicate glass composites

2018· article· en· W2900803599 on OpenAlexafffund
Giovanni Donato, Derek Holzscherer, Jeremiah C. Beam, Andrew P. Grosvenor

Bibliographic record

VenueRSC Advances · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear materials and radiation effects
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical ImagingUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOffice of ScienceUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light SourceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBorosilicate glassRare earthPhosphateMaterials scienceComposite materialPhosphate glassChemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

). This was attributed to the difference in the field strength of the rare-earth ions as a result of the difference in the ionic radii. Glass-ceramic composites made by the 1-step method were shown to form in 1 day at 1100 °C and in 3 days at 1000 °C without a significant change in glass or ceramic composition compared to the 1-step composite synthesized at 1100 °C for 3 days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRSC AdvancesSame topicNuclear materials and radiation effectsFrench-language works237,207