Motivation d’élèves en situation d’échec ayant expérimenté une mesure alternative au redoublement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude évalue les retombées de la classe de prolongation de cycle, une mesure alternative au redoublement, sur la motivation à apprendre. Des élèves n’ayant pas les acquis pour passer au deuxième cycle au secondaire ont expérimenté celle-ci. Ils ont été comparés à des pairs du même âge, qui ont été promus, en ce qui a trait à leurs attentes de succès ainsi qu’à la valeur qu’ils accordaient aux apprentissages, de manière générale et plus spécifiquement dans les domaines du français et des mathématiques. Les résultats d’analyses de variance indiquent que cette mesure a eu un effet quelque peu favorable sur le sentiment de compétence scolaire général, ainsi que celui lié spécifiquement aux apprentissages en français. Des conséquences moins négatives que le redoublement lui seraient donc associées, du moins sur le plan des attentes de succès.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".