Additional file 1: of Ambient PM2.5 and risk of emergency room visits for myocardial infarction: impact of regional PM2.5 oxidative potential: a case-crossover study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(Figure S1: Total sampling days for regional oxidative potential (OP) at each site (2012–2013). Values below the 10th percentile (30 days, indicated by the red vertical line) were excluded for sensitivity analyses; Figure S2: Regional estimates of glutathione (OPGSH) and ascorbate (OPAA)-related oxidative potential in Ontario, Canada (2012–2013); Figure S3: Distribution of daily PM2.5 mass concentrations across quartiles of glutathione-related oxidative potential (OPGSH); Figure S4: Ambient PM2.5, PM2.5 oxidative burden and emergency room visits for myocardial infarction: sensitivity analyses excluding sites with less than 1-month of oxidative potential data; Figure S5: Concentration response plots (using cubic splines with 4 knots) for NO2, O3, and Ox and risk of emergency room visits for myocardial infarction; Figure S6: Concentration response plots for PM2.5 and risk of emergency room visits for myocardial infarction above the 90th percentile of OPGSH and below the 50th percentile using cubic splines with 4 knots). (PDF 382 kb)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.950 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".