MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900896735 · doi:10.1002/ece3.4589

Intercontinental migration pattern and genetic differentiation of arctic‐alpine <i>Rhodiola rosea</i> L.: A chloroplast DNA survey

2018· article· en· W2900896735 on OpenAlexaff
Zsuzsanna György, Endre Gy. Tóth, Norbert Incze, Bence Molnár, Mária Höhn

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology and Evolution · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersSzent István EgyetemEmberi Eroforrások MinisztériumaMagyar Tudományos Akadémia
KeywordsBeringiaGlacial periodArcticGeographyGenetic diversityPhylogeographyChloroplast DNASouthern HemisphereBiologyEcologyPaleontologyChloroplastPopulationPhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

a widely distributed arctic-alpine perennial species of the Northern Hemisphere based on sequence analysis of six chloroplast regions. Specimens of 44 localities from the Northern Hemisphere have been sequenced and compared with those available in the GenBank. Our results support the migration of the species into Europe via the Central Asian highland corridor, reaching the European Alpine System (EAS) and also the western European edge, the British Isles. The EAS proved to be an important center of genetic diversity, especially the region of the Eastern Alps and the Dolomites where signs of glacial refugia was observed. Apart from those of the EAS, a common lineage was detected along the Atlantic coast from the British Isles toward Scandinavia as well as Iceland and the eastern parts of North America. Accordingly, the British Isles represent a main link between the northern Atlantic and southern EAS lineages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology and EvolutionSame topicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207