MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900916532 · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2378-9

The predictive performance of short-linear motif features in the prediction of calmodulin-binding proteins

2018· article· en· W2900916532 on OpenAlexafffund
Yixun Li, Mina Maleki, Nicholas J. Carruthers, Paul M. Stemmer, Alioune Ngom, Luis Rueda

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Bioinformatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsCalmodulinMotif (music)Computational biologyDNA microarrayCalmodulin-binding proteinsBioinformaticsBiologyComputer scienceGeneticsBiochemistryGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The prediction of calmodulin-binding (CaM-binding) proteins plays a very important role in the fields of biology and biochemistry, because the calmodulin protein binds and regulates a multitude of protein targets affecting different cellular processes. Computational methods that can accurately identify CaM-binding proteins and CaM-binding domains would accelerate research in calcium signaling and calmodulin function. Short-linear motifs (SLiMs), on the other hand, have been effectively used as features for analyzing protein-protein interactions, though their properties have not been utilized in the prediction of CaM-binding proteins. RESULTS: We propose a new method for the prediction of CaM-binding proteins based on both the total and average scores of known and new SLiMs in protein sequences using a new scoring method called sliding window scoring (SWS) as features for the prediction module. A dataset of 194 manually curated human CaM-binding proteins and 193 mitochondrial proteins have been obtained and used for testing the proposed model. The motif generation tool, Multiple EM for Motif Elucidation (MEME), has been used to obtain new motifs from each of the positive and negative datasets individually (the SM approach) and from the combined negative and positive datasets (the CM approach). Moreover, the wrapper criterion with random forest for feature selection (FS) has been applied followed by classification using different algorithms such as k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machines (SVM), naive Bayes (NB) and random forest (RF). CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed method shows very good prediction results and demonstrates how information contained in SLiMs is highly relevant in predicting CaM-binding proteins. Further, three new CaM-binding motifs have been computationally selected and biologically validated in this study, and which can be used for predicting CaM-binding proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC BioinformaticsSame topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207