MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900921069 · doi:10.1049/iet-cds.2018.5230

Fast digital foreground gain error calibration for pipelined ADC

2018· article· en· W2900921069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Circuits Devices & Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)
FundersDepartment of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology
KeywordsCalibrationComputer scienceSuccessive approximation ADCError detection and correctionComputer hardwareElectronic engineeringAlgorithmMathematicsElectrical engineeringStatisticsEngineeringVoltageComparator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, a fast digital foreground calibration technique to calibrate the gain error in the pipelined analogue‐to‐digital converter (ADC) is proposed. The technique suggested uses maximum reference value of the ADC along with least mean squares adaptive algorithm to compensate the gain error. It avoids the use of slow but accurate reference ADC, thus saving area, power, and design efforts. The proposed calibration algorithm is implemented in Xilinx Artix‐7 FPGA kit to show the effectiveness of the algorithm. After calibration, differential non‐linearity improves by 30% and integral non‐linearity reduces from values +60/−60 LSB to +0.77/–0.77 LSB. Also, signal to noise and distortion ratio and spurious‐free dynamic range improve significantly from 35.9193 and 36.7348 to 75.3619 and 82.2884 dB, respectively, after calibration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it