Achieving Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Multi-Domain Big Data Deduplication in Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Secure data deduplication, as it can eliminate redundancies over encrypted data, has been widely developed in cloud storage to reduce storage space and communication overheads. Among them, the convergent encryption has been extensively adopted. However, it is vulnerable to brute-force attacks that can determine which plaintext in a message space corresponds to a given ciphertext. Many existing schemes have to sacrifice efficiency to resist brute-force attacks, especially for cross-domain deduplication, which is inevitably contrary to practical applications. Moreover, few existing schemes consider protecting the message equality information (i.e., whether two different ciphertexts correspond to an identical plaintext). To address the above challenges, in this paper, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving big data deduplication scheme for a two-level multi-domain architecture. Specifically, by generating a random tag and a constant number of random ciphertexts for each data, our scheme not only ensures data confidentiality under multi-domain deduplication but also resists brute-force attacks. By allowing only the agent and cloud service provider to perform intra-deduplication and inter-deduplication, respectively, our scheme can protect the message equality information from disclosure as much as possible. Detailed security analysis shows that our scheme achieves privacy-preservation for both data content and the message equality information and data integrity while resisting brute-force attacks. Furthermore, extensive simulations demonstrate that our scheme significantly outperforms the existing competing schemes, especially the computational cost and the time complexity of the duplicate search.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".