Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Quebec civil law, a basic purpose is vital for the existence of a trust patrimony. Since the use made of the settlor's property must always meet this purpose, the existence of the trust patrimony is constantly under threat. Generally in personal trusts the purpose will be the protection of one or more beneficiaries. This article is based upon the general postulate that when the protection which is sought is no longer needed, the trust loses its purpose and, as a result, it must be terminated. Thus the crucial issue has to do with the effects of the renunciation of the beneficiary on the trust, an institution limited in time. The author reaches the conclusion that renunciation, in itself, does not terminate the trust, although it may well terminate it, especially if it denotes that the use made of the property no longer meets the purpose. The goal of this article is to propose, with regard to the decision to terminate a trust, an approach which will take into account the reality of the beneficiaries and at the same time will focus on the intent of the settlor, namely by presuming such intent in the interpretation of the trust deed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".