MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901022981 · doi:10.7202/1052750ar

Tuer l’oeuvre dans l’oeuf : dés-écritures du plateau

2018· article· fr· W2901022981 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anne-Marie Ouellet

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose d’observer comment certains créateurs de la scène contemporaine travaillent à maintenir leur oeuvre dans un informe, un « à venir » (Blanchot, 1959), qui ouvre un champ illimité de constructions fictionnelles. Selon l’hypothèse défendue, par le recours au procédé de minoration (Deleuze, 1979), qui consiste à affaiblir ou à retirer volontairement un ou des éléments constituants de l’oeuvre, les trois oeuvres étudiées appelleraient une participation plus active du spectateur dans sa réception. Blind Cinema (2015), de Britt Hatzius, s’appuie sur un principe de masquage. The Pyre (2013), de Gisèle Vienne, retire le texte de la représentation pour enfouir la fiction dans les corps des interprètes. La chambre sonore de la maladie de la mort (2018), de L’eau du bain, parie sur une écriture scénique au conditionnel qui s’interdit d’affirmer un récit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtralesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207