An Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Disease Risk Prediction Scheme for E-Healthcare
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Big data mining-driven disease risk prediction has become one of the important topics in the field of e-healthcare. However, without the security and privacy assurances, disease risk prediction cannot continue to flourish. To address this challenge, in this paper, an efficient and privacy-preserving disease risk prediction scheme for e-healthcare is proposed, hereafter referred to as EPDP. Compared with the up-to-date works, the proposed EPDP comprehensively achieves two phases of disease risk prediction, i.e., disease model training and disease prediction, while ensuring the privacy preservation. Specifically, a super-increasing sequence is combined with a homomorphic cryptographic algorithm to efficiently extract the symptom set of each disease in the phase of disease model training. Bloom filter technique is introduced to compute the prediction result in the phase of disease risk prediction. Besides, extensive performance evaluations demonstrate that our proposed EPDP attains outstanding efficiency advantage over the state-of-the-art in terms of both computational and communication overheads, and hence our EPDP is more suitable for real-time e-healthcare, especially medical emergency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it