Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This documentary intends to question video game's virtual, social and production environments, in which, despite being majority among players, women still struggle for recognition and representation. Since it's conception, games have followed computer sciences' footsteps and have devoted their production and advertising to masculine audiences. Hence, women's stereotypical representation in games, in addition to the masculine and discriminatory environment in which their production in embedded, establish a gamer culture that isn't democratic towards different genders. In order to verify the conception that states that video games are men's domain, the production of the documentary Damsel in Defense: women in games gathered interviews with women that play and work with games in Brazil and Canada. Through a plural approach of different issues and opinions related to the discussion at hand, this documentary had as it's objective to analyse women's representation, representativity and work environment in the games industry and, in addition, to promote feminists social projects that aim to actively change this situation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it