MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901059805 · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b11309

One-Pot 1,1-Dihydrofluoroalkylation of Amines Using Sulfuryl Fluoride

2018· article· en· W2901059805 on OpenAlexafffund
Maxim Epifanov, Paul J. Foth, Frances Gu, Charlotte Barrillon, Sahil S. Kanani, Carolyn S. Higman, Jason E. Hein, Glenn M. Sammis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicFluorine in Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryReagentAmine gas treatingPrimary (astronomy)FluorideAlkylationOrganic chemistrySubstrate (aquarium)Combinatorial chemistryCatalysisInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sulfuryl fluoride, SO2F2, has been known and used as a fumigant for over 50 years but it has only recently gained widespread interest as a reagent for organic synthesis. Herein we report a novel application of sulfuryl fluoride gas in a new 1,1-dihydrofluoroalkylation reaction, which simply involves bubbling SO2F2 through a solution of amine, 1,1-dihydrofluoroalcohol, and diisopropylethylamine. The reaction is successful for a wide range of primary and secondary amines, as well as several 1,1-dihydrofluoroalcohols, to afford the 1,1-dihydrofluoroalkylated amines in 42% to 80% isolated yields. The reaction also displays excellent functional group tolerance. The ease of the one-pot activation and alkylation, combined with the wide substrate scope make this new procedure an attractive alternative to existing 1,1-dihydrofluoroalkylation methodologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicFluorine in Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207