MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901062581 · doi:10.1080/19342039.2018.1512347

Liberating the Work Instinct from the Economy

2018· article· en· W2901062581 on OpenAlexaff
Michael P. Sipiora

Bibliographic record

VenueJung Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
Canadian institutionsPacific Safety Products (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstinctIngenuityWork (physics)CapitalismUnconscious mindDimension (graph theory)SociologyEpistemologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLawEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author follows James Hillman in interpreting the contemporary breakdown of work as a symptom of an Economic unconscious. Vico’s notion of work as imaginative ingenuity is used to challenge capitalism’s single-minded linkage between work and economics. This opens the possibility of identifying, as suggested by Hillman, a work instinct understood in terms of the gestural hand and the drive to make meaningful contact with the world. Work is then related to the common good in connection to the social dimension of life that Vico associates with the sensus communis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.053
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJung JournalSame topicHannah Arendt's Political PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207