MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901077747

Syrah’s Q1 graphite output down but remains on track for 2018 target

2018· article· en· W2901077747 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Davide Ghilotti

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)AnodeGraphiteTrack (disk drive)Quarter (Canadian coin)Battery capacityWaste managementNatural resource economicsBusinessEnvironmental scienceAgricultural economicsEngineeringCommerceEconomicsMaterials sciencePower (physics)MetallurgyGeographyMechanical engineeringChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Balama operation came online at a time when market prices for graphite were increasing, following a sharp decline in availability from China, the single largest supplier, and a parallel rebound in demand from end-markets such as refractories and batteries. The company has been separately carrying out testing of battery anode materials, using graphite mined at Balama, as part of a battery anode materials (BAM) project which it wants to set up in the United States to supply battery makers. A feasibility study now in the works is expected to be completed in the third quarter to establish the potential size and commercial expansion of the BAM facility.Syrah expects the global demand for natural flake graphite to reach 780,000 tonnes in 2018, up by 10% year on year, the company said.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207