Engaging with Nature in Times of Rapid Environmental Change: Vulnerability, Sentience and Autonomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los cambios ambientales cada vez más rápidos desde mediados del siglo xx plantean un \ndesafío importante para las poblaciones humanas vulnerables. Los nativos de América de la \ncosta noroeste, como muchas otras poblaciones indígenas en todo el mundo, han concebido \nlos paisajes como seres sensibles y capaces de responder a la acción humana. Aquí exploramos \nla consecuente “responsabilidad social” por el paisaje en el contexto de vulnerabilidad al \ncambio ambiental rápido. Se debate la base del respeto que subyace este sentido de responsabilidad, \ny su importancia para abordar la vulnerabilidad humana frente a la agencia de \nla naturaleza, a través de prácticas más adecuadas de mitigación y adaptación. Se concluye \nque enfrentamos un imperativo de reconcebir la agencia de los fenómenos naturales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.047 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".