MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901127640 · doi:10.1002/asjc.1974

Optimal Controller Design with Communication Delay for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell

2018· article· en· W2901127640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Control · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)Nonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceSolid oxide fuel cellControl engineeringState (computer science)Control (management)SIGNAL (programming language)Distributed computingEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Development of distributed control algorithms has attracted significant attention for control of large‐scale processes. In distributed control systems, there are signal transmissions between local subsystems. One subsystem does not have complete knowledge of the whole system and interactions between subsystems are not completely considered. Communication delay also places limitations on achievable best performance. In this paper, considering communication delay, a distributed method is proposed to design an optimal controller using a discrete linear model. The advantage of the proposed method is in taking communication delay into account and being robust against subsystem failure. The proposed approach has been applied on a solid oxide fuel cell, which is extremely nonlinear and has a huge number of state variables. The results show the advantages and applicability of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it