MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901138763 · doi:10.1111/ajt.15190

Bandages will not fix a fractured system of chronic kidney disease care: Why the Dialysis PATIENTS Demonstration Act cannot be supported by the transplant community

2018· letter· en· W2901138763 on OpenAlexaff
John S. Gill, Alexander C. Wiseman

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDialysisIntensive care medicineKidney diseaseKidney transplantationTransplantationKidney transplantArtificial kidneyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This editorial presents concerns about efforts to advance an integrated dialysis care plan that does not prioritize prevention of kidney failure and transplantation for patients who develop end-stage kidney disease. Read Becker and Nissenson's viewpoint on page 995.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.1050.089
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TransplantationSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207