MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901148753 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2018-0160

Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of the bedded chert during the Ordovician and Silurian transition in the Shizhu area, Chongqing, South China

2018· article· en· W2901148753 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bin Lü, Zhen Qiu, Baohua Zhang, Jian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOrdovicianTerrigenous sedimentGeochemistrySedimentary rockPetrographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large amount of bedded chert widely deposited during the Ordovician and Silurian transition in South China. In this study, analyses of the petrographic characteristics, the major elements and rare earth elements (REEs), were conducted on 31 bedded chert samples obtained from the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations at the Qiliao section in the Shizhu area of the Sichuan Basin to determine the sedimentary environment and the origin of the bedded chert during the Ordovician and Silurian transition. The following conclusions were obtained: (i) the bedded chert in the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations at the Qiliao Section originated mainly from terrigenous input and siliceous organisms and was slightly influenced by hydrothermal fluid, (ii) siliceous organisms were a key factor controlling the differences in the SiO 2 content of the bedded chert in the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations at the Qiliao Section, and (iii) the bedded chert in the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations deposited in a continental margin environment during the Ordovician and Silurian transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207