MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901152217 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.054307

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math>-decay half-lives of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Sb</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>134</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>134</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> and their isomeric yield ratio produced by the spontaneous fission of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cf</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>252</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2018· article· lv· W2901152217 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. Siegl, K. Kolos, N. D. Scielzo, A. Aprahamian, G. Savard, M. T. Burkey, M. P. Carpenter, P. Chowdhury, J. A. Clark, P. Copp, G. J. Lane, C. J. Lister, S. T. Marley, E. A. McCutchan, A. J. Mitchell, J. Rohrer, M. L. Smith, S. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsAustralian Research CouncilNuclear Safety and Security CommissionUniversity of Notre DameU.S. Department of EnergyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Nuclear Security AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSpontaneous fissionFissionYield (engineering)Fission product yieldAtomic physicsGround stateNuclear physicsEnergy (signal processing)Neutron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of fission products possess isomeric states which have a nuclear spin significantly different from that of the ground state. The yield ratio of these states following fission is influenced by the angular momentum present in the fissioning system. The $^{134m,134}\mathrm{Sb}$ yield ratio had not been previously measured in the spontaneous fission of $^{252}\mathrm{Cf}$; however, it had previously been observed to favor the (${7}^{\ensuremath{-}}$) isomer over the (${0}^{\ensuremath{-}}$) ground state in $^{235}\mathrm{U}({n}_{th},f$) and $^{232}\mathrm{Th}$(25 MeV $p,f$). Using a mass-separated beam of low-energy $^{134,134m}\mathrm{Sb}$ ions produced by $^{252}\mathrm{Cf}$ spontaneous fission at the CARIBU facility, $\ensuremath{\beta}$ particles and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays were detected using the SATURN/X-Array decay station to determine the fission-yield ratio and $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay half-lives. The $^{134m}\mathrm{Sb}$ to $^{134}\mathrm{Sb}$ fission yield was determined to be $2.03\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05$ and the half-lives of $^{134m}\mathrm{Sb}$ and $^{134}\mathrm{Sb}$ were found to be $9.87\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08$ s and $0.674\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.004$ s, respectively. These results represent the first isomeric yield ratio measurement for this nucleus, and improved measurements of the $^{134}\mathrm{Sb}$ ground state and the $^{134m}\mathrm{Sb}$ isomer half-lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3150.309

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207