The 16‐Day Planetary Wave Triggers the SW1‐Tidal‐Like Signatures During 2009 Sudden Stratospheric Warming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Enhanced nonmigrating tides SW1 (SWx represents semidiurnal westward mode with zonal wave number x) and SW3 during sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) were traditionally attributed to nonlinear interactions of quasi‐stationary planetary waves with the migrating tide SW2. Recent studies specified hypothetically that responsible for the interactions is the 16‐day wave, instead of the broadly accepted quasi‐stationary planetary waves. It is suspected that the 16‐day‐wave‐triggered secondary waves, at periods ∼12.4 and ∼11.6 hr, were detected at low‐frequency resolutions and misinterpreted as SW1 and SW3, respectively. While He et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JD028400 ) associated the 11.6‐hr oscillation conclusively to the SW3‐like signature during SSW 2013 by diagnosing its wave number, the SW1‐like 12.4hr wave, however, has never been explicitly resolved, given its proximity to the period of an active lunar tide. Here, using the coherency in the mesospheric wind between two longitudinal sectors during SSW 2009, we identify a 12.4‐hr oscillation dominated by wave number 1 and therefore associate it to the SW1‐like signature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".