MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901202142 · doi:10.3390/ijgi7110450

Real-Time Efficient Exploration in Unknown Dynamic Environments Using MAVs

2018· article· en· W2901202142 on OpenAlexafffund
H. A. Mohamed, Adel Moussa, Mohamed Elhabiby, Naser El‐Sheimy

Bibliographic record

VenueISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTrajectoryPayload (computing)Computer scienceReal-time computingProcess (computing)MaximizationTime constraintTask (project management)Path (computing)Constraint (computer-aided design)Real-time dataDynamismTrajectory optimizationEngineeringMathematical optimizationComputer securitySystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Micro aerial vehicles (MAVs) have been acknowledged as an influential technology for indoor search and rescue operations. The time constraint is a crucial factor in most search and rescue operations. The employed MAVs in indoor environments are characterized by short endurance flight time and limited payload weights. Hence, adding more batteries to extend the flight time is practically not feasible. Typically, most of the indoor missions’ environments might not be accessed and remain unknown. Working in such environments requires effective exploration and information gathering to save time and maximize the coverage area. Furthermore, due to the dynamism of such environments, choosing the least risky trajectory is an important task. This paper proposes a real-time active exploration technique which is capable of efficiently generating paths that minimize the vehicle’s risk and maximize the coverage area. Furthermore, it accomplishes real-time monitoring of sudden changes in the estimated map, due to the dynamic objects, by reevaluating at real-time the destination and trajectory to minimize the risk on the chosen path and simultaneously preserving the maximization of the coverage area. Ultimately, recording the implemented trajectory of the vehicle also assists in time-saving as the vehicle depends on this trajectory during the exit process. The performance of the technique is studied under static and dynamic environments and is also compared with different algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207