MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901208445

L’IMPACT DU CHAPITRE 11 DE L’ALENA SUR LACAPACITE DE L’ETAT D’ADOPTER DESMESURES PROTEGEANT L’ENVIRONNEMENTET LA SANTE PUBLIQUE : LES TRAVAUXRECENTS DE CHERCHEURS EN SANTEPUBLIQUE JETTENT UN

2013· article· fr· W2901208445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geneviève Dufour

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Bar Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawsuitLegislationPolitical scienceCorporationPublic healthLegislatureGovernment (linguistics)HumanitiesState (computer science)Public administrationLawArtMedicineNursingPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Does Chapter 11 of NAFTA have an impact on the state’s authority to enact measures to protect the environment and public health? In 1998, the Government of Canada settled a lawsuit with Ethyl Corporation, an American company, and repealed the challenged legislative provisions. Many analysts do not find this problematic, as they believe that the legislation in question was not really aimed at protecting the environment and public safety, but instead was protectionist. However, recent public health studies are now casting new light on this issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Bar ReviewSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207