MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901208445

L’IMPACT DU CHAPITRE 11 DE L’ALENA SUR LACAPACITE DE L’ETAT D’ADOPTER DESMESURES PROTEGEANT L’ENVIRONNEMENTET LA SANTE PUBLIQUE : LES TRAVAUXRECENTS DE CHERCHEURS EN SANTEPUBLIQUE JETTENT UN

2013· article· fr· W2901208445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geneviève Dufour

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Bar Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawsuitLegislationPolitical scienceCorporationPublic healthLegislatureGovernment (linguistics)HumanitiesState (computer science)Public administrationLawArtMedicineNursingPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Does Chapter 11 of NAFTA have an impact on the state’s authority to enact measures to protect the environment and public health? In 1998, the Government of Canada settled a lawsuit with Ethyl Corporation, an American company, and repealed the challenged legislative provisions. Many analysts do not find this problematic, as they believe that the legislation in question was not really aimed at protecting the environment and public safety, but instead was protectionist. However, recent public health studies are now casting new light on this issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0140.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Bar ReviewSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207