MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901228169 · doi:10.1017/9789048529162.006

‘Tired, Worried and Overworked’: An International Imagined Community of Nervous Sufferers in Medical Advertisements, 1900-1920

2018· other· en· W2901228169 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gemma Blok

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingPsychologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Widely advertised around 1900, Pink Pills (patent medicines containing zinc or iron) were promoted to cure all kinds of ailments, including neurasthenia (‘weakness of the nerves’). The extensive advertisements portraying their consumers connected the ritual of daily pill taking to new psychiatric notions of ‘nervous fatigue’ as a legitimate modern condition. All over the world, newspaper readers were given the opportunity to identify with other ‘neurasthenics’: people they had never met, but who, like them, apparently struggled with the tensions and quick pace of modern life. Through reading newspapers and consuming Pink Pills, one could feel part of this imagined community. Thus, the patent medicine business was instrumental in the establishment of new psychiatric ways of thinking about oneself and the world. Keywords: patent medicines, neurasthenia, history, newspaper advertisements, imagined community In 1907, a Mr W.W. Munroe, of 16 Hazel Park, Everett, Massachusetts, was quoted in an advertising campaign in American local newspapers as saying he had become ‘ill from overwork’. While working as a foreman in a large manufacturing establishment in Boston, during a particularly hot summer where he was working in confined conditions, he started losing weight, strength and appetite. His memory started to fail him, he lost interest in life, and friends remarked on his abysmal condition. One of his friends recommended a possible remedy: Pink Pills, which ‘actually make new blood, and have cured such diseases as rheumatism, nervous and general debility, indigestion, and nervous headache’. The pills worked for Mr Munroe, he claimed. After several weeks, he had fully recovered. Pink Pills, an originally Canadian product, were introduced in America and many other countries during the late nineteenth century. The pills were said to help against many ailments that were caused by ‘physical and mental exhaustion’, such as migraines, an upset stomach, anaemia and the psychiatric condition called neurasthenia (nervous weakness). They refreshed the blood and gave its users a rosy complexion, hence the name. In the first decades of the twentieth century, advertisements for Pink Pills were omnipresent in newspapers around the world. Many of the ads were journalist-style written reports on people who, like Mr Munroe, were greatly revitalized thanks to the Pink Pills. Taken together, I will argue, these ads created an international imagined community of nervous sufferers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0310.017
Scholarly communication0.0140.011
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207