Combinatorial processing of bacterial and host-derived innate immune stimuli at the single-cell level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the course of a bacterial infection, cells are exposed simultaneously to a range of bacterial and host factors, which converge on the central transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-κB. How do single cells integrate and process these converging stimuli? Here we tackle the question of how cells process combinatorial signals by making quantitative single-cell measurements of the NF-κB response to combinations of bacterial lipopolysaccharide and the stress cytokine tumor necrosis factor. We found that cells encode the presence of both stimuli via the dynamics of NF-κB nuclear translocation in individual cells, suggesting the integration of NF-κB activity for these stimuli occurs at the molecular and pathway level. However, the gene expression and cytokine secretion response to combinatorial stimuli were more complex, suggesting that other factors in addition to NF-κB contribute to signal integration at downstream layers of the response. Taken together, our results support the theory that during innate immune threat assessment, a pathogen recognized as both foreign and harmful will recruit an enhanced immune response. Our work highlights the remarkable capacity of individual cells to process multiple input signals and suggests that a deeper understanding of signal integration mechanisms will facilitate efforts to control dysregulated immune responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".