Clinical and functional characterization of recurrent missense variants implicated in<i>THOC6</i>-related intellectual disability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THOC6 encodes a subunit of the THO complex that is part of a highly conserved transcription and export complex known to have roles in mRNA processing and export. Few homozygous or compound heterozygous variants have been identified in the THOC6 gene in patients with a syndromic form of intellectual disability [Beaulieu-Boycott-Innes syndrome (BBIS); MIM: 613680]. Here we report two additional individuals affected with BBIS originating from the north of Europe and sharing a haplotype composed of three very rare missense changes in the THOC6 gene-Trp100Arg, Val234Leu, Gly275Asp. The first individual is a boy who is homozygous for the three-variant haplotype due to a maternal uniparental disomy event. The second is a girl who is compound heterozygous for this haplotype and a previously reported Gly190Glu missense variant. We analyzed the impact of these different amino acid changes on THOC6 protein expression, cellular localization and interaction with the other THO complex subunits. We show that the different THOC6 variants alter the physiological nuclear localizationof the protein and its interaction with at least two THO subunits, THOC1 and THOC5. Two amino acid changes from the three-variant haplotype alone have specific effects and might contribute to the pathogenicity of the haplotype. Overall, we expanded the cohort of currently known individuals with BBIS by reporting two individuals carrying the same recurrent European haplotype composed of three amino acid changes, affecting THOC6 localization and interaction with THO protein partners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".