MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901302224 · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0293-7

Publisher Correction: Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L

2018· erratum· en· W2901302224 on OpenAlexaff
Jisen Zhang, Xingtan Zhang, Haibao Tang, Qing Zhang, Xiuting Hua, Xiaokai Ma, Fan Zhu, Tyler Jones, Xin‐Guang Zhu, John Bowers, Ching Man Wai, Chunfang Zheng, Yan Shi, Shuai Chen, Xiuming Xu, Jingjing Yue, David R. Nelson, Lixian Huang, Zhen Li, Huimin Xu, Dongmei Zhou, Yongjun Wang, Weichang Hu, Jishan Lin, Youjin Deng, Neha Pandey, Melina Cristina Mancini, D. M. de Zerpa, Julie K. Nguyen, Liming Wang, Liang Yu, Yinghui Xin, Liangfa Ge, Jie Arro, Jennifer Han, Setu Chakrabarty, Marija Pushko, Wenping Zhang, Yanhong Ma, Panpan Ma, Mingju Lv, Fa‐Ming Chen, Guangyong Zheng, Jingsheng Xu, Zhenhui Yang, Fang Deng, Xuequn Chen, Zhenyang Liao, Xunxiao Zhang, Zhicong Lin, Hai Lin, Hansong Yan, Zheng Kuang, Weimin Zhong, Pingping Liang, Guofeng Wang, Yuan Yuan, Jiaxian Shi, Jinxiang Hou, Jingxian Lin, Jingjing Jin, Peijian Cao, Qiaochu Shen, Qingwu Jiang, Ping Zhou, Yaying Ma, Xiaodan Zhang, Rongrong Xu, Juan Liu, Yongmei Zhou, Haifeng Jia, Qing Ma, Rui Qi, Zhiliang Zhang, Jingping Fang, Hongkun Fang, Jinjin Song, Mengjuan Wang, Guangrui Dong, Gang Wang, Zheng Chen, Teng Ma, Hong Liu, Singha R. Dhungana, Sarah E. Huss, Xiping Yang, Anupma Sharma, Jhon H. Trujillo, Maria Cristina Martinez, Matthew E. Hudson, John J. Riascos, Mary A. Schuler, Li‐Qing Chen, David Braun, Lei Li, Qingyi Yu, Jianping Wang, Kai Wang, Michael C. Schatz, David Heckerman, Marie‐Anne Van Sluys, Gláucia Mendes Souza, Paul H. Moore, David Sankoff, Robert VanBuren, Andrew H. Paterson, Chifumi Nagai, Ray Ming

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Genetics · 2018
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGenomeAccession number (library science)AccessionSection (typography)AnnotationGeneSaccharumAlleleGeneticsComputational biologyBotanyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature GeneticsSame topicSugarcane Cultivation and ProcessingFrench-language works237,207