MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901333871 · doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1549159

Air nanobubble-enhanced combustion study using mustard biodiesel in a common rail direct injection engine

2018· article· en· W2901333871 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S. Gobinath, G. Senthilkumar, Beemkumar Nagappan

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsNOxBiodieselCetane numberCommon railDiesel fuelCombustionDiesel engineEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringWaste managementBrake specific fuel consumptionEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though the biodiesel is environmental friendly than the conventional petroleum diesel in the aspects of better combustion quality due to higher cetane number (up to 65), reduced emission, and reduced air pollution, running the common rail direct injection (CRDI) engine with 100% biodiesel is not viable due to NOx and CO emissions. The present experimental investigation revealed that the above difficulty can be controlled by running CRDI engine with air nanobubble (ANBs)-enabled biodiesel. The results indicated that there was a reduction of 25% in brake-specific fuel consumption, 33% in NOx, and 16% in CO due to the addition of ANBs with mustard oil biodiesel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental EffectsSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207