MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901361815 · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07398-1

Author Correction: Bi-directional cell-pericellular matrix interactions direct stem cell fate

2018· erratum· en· W2901361815 on OpenAlexaff
Sílvia A. Ferreira, Meghna S. Motwani, Peter Faull, Alexis J. Seymour, Tracy T. L. Yu, Marjan Enayati, Dheraj K. Taheem, Christoph Salzlechner, Tabasom Haghighi, Ewa M. Kania, Oommen P. Oommen, Tarek Ahmed, Sandra Loaiza, Katarzyna Parzych, Francesco Dazzi, Oommen P. Varghese, Frederic Festy, Agamemnon E. Grigoriadis, Holger W. Auner, Ambrosius P. Snijders, Laurent Bozec, Eileen Gentleman

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2018
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFrancis Crick Institute
KeywordsIdentifierComputer scienceStatement (logic)Computational biologyData miningInformation retrievalBiologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the original version of this Article the dataset identifier in the Data Availability statement was incorrect. The correct dataset identifier is PXD009500. This has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207