MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901376382 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2878382

Improving Soil Available Nutrient Estimation by Integrating Modified WOFOST Model and Time-Series Earth Observations

2018· article· en· W2901376382 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiqiang Cheng, Jihua Meng, Jiali Shang, Jiangui Liu, Yanyou Qiao, Budong Qian, Qi Jing, Taifeng Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilChinese Academy of SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsData assimilationAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematicsEnvironmental sciencePhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information on soil available nutrient (SAN) at key crop growth stages is critical to generate prescription maps for implementing variable rate fertilization (VRF). Our previous study showed that integrating time-series remote sensing (RS) data with the modified World Food Studies (WOFOST) crop model provides a useful approach (preliminary RS-WOFOST-based method) to acquiring information on field SAN; however, the estimation accuracy was low for VRF application. In this paper, three steps were proposed to further improve the SAN estimation accuracy. At the first step, the rapid-nutrient assimilation (RNA) method was used to optimize the crop growth simulation process. Compared with the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) method, the RNA method showed an improved performance in estimating soil available nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) content [EnKF: R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> = 0.48 (N), 0.37 (P), 0.15 (K); RNA: R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> = 0.59 (N), 0.46 (P), and 0.18 (K)]. The improved K estimation at the first step was clearly lower than that of N and P; hence, the K content estimation was further optimized at the second step and the accuracy was improved (R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> = 0.27) by using the estimated N as an input variable during the K estimation. At the third step, an iteration algorithm was implemented based on the first two steps, and the final R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> = 0.71 (N), 0.58 (P), 0.49 (K); root-mean-square error = 14.35 (N), 3.70 (P), and 14.87 (K). In general, the optimized approach can overcome the limitations of the preliminary RS-WOFOST-based method and improve the SAN estimation accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207