A SURVEY OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS IN EGYPT: THE CURRENT STATUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Project Management is considered now one of the most dynamic and growing professions worldwide. Effective project management not only reduces unnecessary costs of doing business, but also has become as a crucial factor to gain a competitive advantage and determines the success and survive of organizations. In the last decade, there is a global international interest and attention for organizations to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of its project management practices. Given such background, this clarifies the dramatic increase in the attention, research and practices of the project management maturity and the maturity models. Maturity Models has taken on greater significance not only in assessing organization’s current project management capabilities and efficiency, but also as a path for achieving excellence in project management and further performance improvement. The capability maturity model, the first maturity model developed, has achieved a wide success and Organizations implementing this approach experience and report significant benefits and return on investment. Various models have since been developed and proposed, and they are most commonly implemented in developed countries such as USA, UK, Canada, Europe, etc. The excessive variety of maturity models has made the choice between them difficult and need careful attention and consideration in both the model choice and implementation in the business. In Egypt, there is a lack of documentation available on the current status, awareness and utilization of maturity models in the contracting organizations working in the construction sector and this study aims to fill this gap. To achieve this, it was necessary to consult project management experts and professionals to get an understanding of how these organizations view maturity models and project management standards and to establish the most common business practices and so propose the basis of a maturity model for Egyptian construction contractors that best fits the current status. Based on the analysis of the survey conducted, it was concluded that project management tools and methodologies have not yet been utilized effectively in the Egyptian construction contracting organizations and that there is much room for improvement regarding project management practices in these organizations in order for Egypt to develop the contracting construction sector as a pillar for the Egyptian economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".