MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901426375 · doi:10.4000/aes.1273

La bibliothèque de Guillaume Budé

2018· article· fr· W2901426375 on OpenAlexaff
Luigi-Alberto Sanchi

Bibliographic record

VenueArts et Savoirs · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avec le dépouillement du contenu érudit des cinq livres De Asse et partibus eius (1515 ; septième éd., 1541), qui s’ajoutent à celui des quelque vingt mille citations formant les Commentarii linguæ Græcæ (1529 ; éd. définitive, 1548), il est possible d’enrichir sensiblement la liste de livres de la bibliothèque intellectuelle de Guillaume Budé (1468-1540), dont une partie seulement est matériellement identifiée. Il en ressort un vaste tableau, certes à mettre à jour dès que le contenu des deux éditions d’Annotationes in Pandectas (1508 et 1526 ; éd. définitive, 1535) sera précisément connu, mais signalant déjà Budé comme un lecteur aussi vorace qu’encyclopédique, bon connaisseur des classiques mais surtout grand explorateur des textes ardus des grammairiens, des théologiens, des juristes, des agronomes et d’autres auteurs dits techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArts et SavoirsSame topicHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207