MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901440519 · doi:10.1039/c8re00226f

Origins of complex solvent effects on chemical reactivity and computational tools to investigate them: a review

2018· review· en· W2901440519 on OpenAlexafffund
Jithin John Varghese, Samir H. Mushrif

Bibliographic record

VenueReaction Chemistry & Engineering · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis for Biomass Conversion
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReactivity (psychology)SolventSelectivityChemistryCatalysisSolvent effectsComputational simulationComputational chemistryBiochemical engineeringCombinatorial chemistryComputer scienceOrganic chemistryEngineeringMedicineComputational science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Origins of solvent-induced enhancement in catalytic reactivity and product selectivity are discussed with computational methods to study them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations215
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReaction Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicCatalysis for Biomass ConversionFrench-language works237,207