MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901476445 · doi:10.22388/2525-5894.2018.0043

BUILDING A NEW RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE COMMUNITY, AN INTERVENTION WITH ADOLESCENTS IN THE FAMILY HEALTH UNIT

2018· article· en· W2901476445 on OpenAlexaff
Bruna Amorim Matos Ferreira, Simone de Souza Santos, Célia Regina Rangel Nascimento, Dhébora Christo Borges, Elisara Licia Sant`Anna, Maria Rita Andreão Romanel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnit (ring theory)Intervention (counseling)Computer sciencePsychologyPsychiatryMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maria Rita Andreão Romanel -Assistente Social da Unidade de Saúde da Família de Jesus de Nazareth-Vitória-ES Relato de intervenção realizada no Projeto de extensão "Promovendo Diálogo Sobre Saúde e Vida com Adolescentes", registrado na Pró-Reitoria de Extensão da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, coordenado por docente do curso de Psicologia em parceria com a equipe da unidade de Saúde da Família de Jesus de Nazareth. ResumoOs espaços da saúde, particularmente as Unidades de Saúde da Família, por estarem mais próximas das comunidades, podem compor uma importante rede de apoio para os adolescentes.O projeto de extensão "Promovendo Diálogo Sobre Saúde e Vida com Adolescentes", realizado na Unidade de Saúde da Família de um bairro de classe popular de Vitória -ES, tem esse objetivo.Pretende-se neste trabalho descrever as intervenções, realizadas em 2018, que promoveram a reflexão sobre a identidade dos adolescentes e o sentimento de pertença ao seu bairro e sua a comunidade, visto que o laço social é fundamental na construção da vida e da identidade do indivíduo.Com um grupo de 15 adolescentes, foram realizadas oficinas lúdicas e rodas de conversa abordando o tema "Pertencimento ao Bairro", mediadas pela equipe composta pelas

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207