MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901509422 · doi:10.1353/nin.2016.0004

Four Guys from Birmingham: A Paradigm for Understanding the White Southern Response to Integration

2016· article· en· W2901509422 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John N. Ingham

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueWhite (mutation)MainstreamHistorySpanish Civil WarGenealogyGender studiesMedia studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four Guys from BirminghamA Paradigm for Understanding the White Southern Response to Integration John N. Ingham (bio) Jackie Robinson broke into major league baseball in 1947, integrating what was then called the “national pastime,” as the first African American allowed to play at that level since Moses Fleetwood Walker in the late nineteenth century. This was a momentous event in the history of civil rights in America and has been covered in great detail in a number of books and articles over the years.1 Robinson’s entry into the major league ranks was not accepted with equanimity by everyone involved, and this, too, has been substantially chronicled by others. The intention in this article is to focus upon four young men from Birmingham, Alabama, the so-called “Johannesburg” of North America, who took various leadership positions in opposing Robinson’s entry in 1947. I will then chart the evolution of their lives and careers for the decades after that time. By examining that, I hope to provide a clearer picture of the way in which many other individuals in the Deep South accommodated themselves to the new world of integration that had been thrust upon them. My chief hypothesis is that the varying paths these four Birmingham ballplayers took concerning integration over the years provides a rough paradigm of the path taken by most other southern whites. Generally, the American South in the early years after World War II, and for several decades after, displayed an unyielding attitude regarding integrating African Americans into the mainstream of life on any level—residence, schools, workplace and so forth. Since the 1970s, national opinion polls, such as those conducted by the Gallup organization, show a steady increase in the South among whites in support of racial integration and equality. In 1956, white southerners were overwhelmingly opposed to school integration, while the white North had become broadly accepting of the idea (if not the practice). By 1985, however, only seven percent of whites in the South strongly opposed integrated schools. [End Page 57] Support for segregation in all parts of the United States has given way to substantial support for integration and equal treatment. In 1985, seventy-four percent of the white population nationally claimed to disagree with the statement that “white people have a right to keep blacks out of their neighborhoods.” 2 By that point there was little difference between whites in the North and South on this question.3 As a recent article on racial attitudes has stated: “No longer is the South the bastion of racial prejudice.”4 By the 1990s it tended to resemble the rest of the country in its racial attitudes. Given how rabid were the negative attitudes toward integration in the South in the 1940s and up through the 1960s, it has never been made completely clear how and why the region was able to change such deeply held beliefs, and just how much practice, as opposed to attitudes, has actually changed. An investigation of the lives of these four men, both in and out of baseball, should provide some clues as to the nature of this transformation. In order to understand the nature of their reaction to Robinson’s introduction to major league baseball, it will useful to comprehend a little better the nature of Birmingham, their home town, in 1947. birmingham in 1947 Birmingham was Eugene “Bull” Connor’s town in 1947, just as it was in the late 1930s and throughout the 1950s and into the early 1960s. The most popular politician in the city, he was at the height of his powers in 1947. He was fifty years old, and he had served in the powerful role of Commissioner of Public Safety for ten years. Born in Selma, Connor had moved to Birmingham as a boy and in the 1920s gained popularity doing play-by-play action of away games of the local white baseball team, the Birmingham Barons.5 By 1932, the Sporting News called him “one of the most popular sportscasters in the South.”6 This recognition gave him the impetus to enter Democratic politics, and his election in 1937 as police commissioner was a turning point in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207