MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901535122 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.118.021484

Collateral Clock Is More Important Than Time Clock for Tissue Fate

2018· article· en· W2901535122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Achala Vagal, Richard I. Aviv, Heidi Sucharew, M. Vijayaray Reddy, Qinghua Hou, Patrik Michel, Tudor G. Jovin, Thomas A. Tomsick, Max Wintermark, Pooja Khatri

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
KeywordsPenumbraMedicineThrombolysisStroke (engine)Collateral circulationPerfusion scanningModified Rankin ScaleCardiologyInternal medicineInfarctionPerfusionRadiologyIschemiaIschemic strokeMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose— Although perfusion abnormality is an increasingly important therapeutic target, the natural history of tissue at risk without reperfusion treatment is understudied. Our objective was to determine how time affects penumbral salvage and infarct growth in untreated acute ischemic stroke patients and whether collateral status affects this relationship. Methods— We used a prospectively collected, multicenter acute stroke registry to assess acute stroke patients who were not treated with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment. We analyzed baseline computed tomography angiogram and computed tomography perfusion within 24 hours of stroke onset along with follow-up imaging and assessed time from stroke onset to baseline imaging, ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score), vessel occlusion, collaterals, ischemic core, and penumbra. Penumbral salvage and infarct growth were calculated. Correlations between time and penumbral salvage and infarct growth were evaluated with Spearman correlation. Penumbral salvage and infarct growth were compared between subjects with good versus poor collateral status using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Clinical and imaging factors affecting penumbral salvage and infarct growth were evaluated by linear regression. Results— Among 94 untreated stroke patients eligible for this analysis, the mean age was 65 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 13, and median (range) time from stroke onset to baseline imaging was 2.9 (0.4–23) hours. There was no correlation between time and salvaged penumbra ( r =0.06; P =0.56) or infarct growth ( r =−0.05; P =0.61). Infarct growth was higher among those with poor collaterals versus those with good collaterals (median, 52.3 versus 0.9 cm 3 ; P <0.01). Penumbral salvage was lower among those with poor collaterals compared with those with good collaterals (poor, 0 [0–0]; good, 5.9 cm 3 [0–29.4]; P <0.01). Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that collaterals, but not time, were significantly associated with infarct growth and penumbral salvage. Conclusions— In this natural history study, penumbral salvage and infarct growth were less time dependent and more a measure of collateral flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations158
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207