Oil Consumption Forecasting Using Optimized Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Based on Sine Cosine Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oil consumption is one of the main factors that affect industry and economy. Therefore, it is very important to estimate and forecast the consumption of oil. This helps the governments to take the right decisions and avoid the wrong decisions that lead to negative outcomes. For that reason, there are several methods that have been applied to forecast the oil consumption, such as the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model. It is one of the most popular data mining methods used to perform the forecast. However, the ANFIS model may not be accurate (biased) in all data, since its parameters require to be determined and updated and this may lead to stuck in the local point and not convergence to the optimal value. To this end, this paper presents an alternative oil consumption forecasting method by improving the ANFIS using the sine–cosine algorithm (SCA). In the proposed method called SCA-ANFIS, the parameters of the ANFIS are optimized using the SCA. In order to assess the performance of the proposed SCA-ANFIS method, a real dataset of petroleum products’ consumption of three countries, namely, Canada, Germany, and Japan, is used. This dataset is collected on the period between 2007 and 2017, which contains 120 records per month for each country. Moreover, the results of the proposed method are compared with variants of ANFIS models. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed SCA-ANFIS method outperforms other algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it