MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901543935 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2018.2874144

A Novel Distributed Antenna Access Architecture for 5G Indoor Service Provisioning

2018· article· en· W2901543935 on OpenAlexaff
Syed Hassan Raza Naqvi, Pin‐Han Ho, Shahida Jabeen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed antenna systemAntenna (radio)ProvisioningComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)Electronic engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to overcome the non-line-of-sight nature of the indoor environment so as to achieve a cost-effective solution of 5G indoor service provisioning, distribution of antenna units in indoor chambers is the most straightforward solution. This paper investigates a novel distributed antenna access architecture that allows the antenna units to be distributed over a wide geographical area via multi-pair LAN cables. The proposed architecture supports simultaneous transmission of multiple intermediate frequency signals between the remote radio unit and each distributed antenna unit. To explore the capacity of the LAN cables, we introduce a real-time multi-pair air-to-cable (MP-A2C) scheduler that allows for a graceful mapping between the radio signal spectrum and sub-channels of the cable twisted pairs, as well as power shaping of each sub-channel signal. We will first provide the problem formulation of the optimal MP-A2C process, which is nonetheless non-convex and computationally intractable. To achieve real-time solution of the problem, we reformulate the problem into two sub-problems that can be solved in a divide-and-conquer manner. Extensive numerical results show that the formulated MP-A2C problem can easily lead to quasi-optimal schedules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in CommunicationsSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207