Origin of Regional Barrovian Metamorphism in Hot Backarcs Prior to Orogeny Deformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article presents evidence that the high temperatures responsible for much regional metamorphism, the Barrovian sequence, occurs in subduction zone backarcs prior to and not, as commonly inferred, as a consequence of heating during continental collision orogeny. This conclusion follows from the recent recognition that most current subduction zones have 200‐ to 1,000‐km wide backarcs that are uniformly hot. They have Barrovian metamorphism vertical temperature gradients that extrapolate to 800–850 °C at a 35‐km Moho, in contrast to ~450 °C for normal stable crust. This explanation overcomes several difficulties of previous explanations. Collisional crustal shortening and thickening as in Himalaya‐Tibet should reduce the vertical gradient by up to a factor of 2, so the high metamorphic temperatures, if associated with crustal shortening, require an increase in gradient of up to a factor of 4 starting from a stable cool continent. Mechanisms previously suggested for the heat, underthrusting of near‐surface radioactive heat generation, ductile/frictional heating, igneous activity, and deformation‐induced lithosphere thinning, have difficulty producing such large heating. They also are not consistent with evidence that some regional metamorphism is syntectonic or predates deformation and that a cool lithosphere is too strong to deform from plate boundary forces. I suggest that the high temperatures of regional metamorphism initiate in the hot backarc prior to deformation events. Multiple phases of metamorphism also may result from uplift during complex ongoing hot backarc deformation. In this interpretation, orogenic deformation is responsible for bringing the previously existing high‐temperature rocks to the surface, not for the metamorphism itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".