MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901639422 · doi:10.4000/tipa.2605

Langue des signes et parentalité : enjeux linguistiques et identitaires

2018· article· fr· W2901639422 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah Kirsch, Charles Gaucher

Bibliographic record

VenueTIPA Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’annonce de surdité de l’enfant peut être vécue comme un choc au sein de la famille. Dans la majorité des cas, les parents sont entendants et ont peu de connaissances sur la surdité. Pourtant, dès les premiers mois, ces parents vont devoir prendre une décision concernant le mode de communication de leur enfant. Le choix d’une communication en langue signée n’est que rarement envisagé par les parents. Cet article repose sur une recherche qualitative faite auprès de 52 parents d’enfant ayant une surdité au Canada et s’intéresse aux défis linguistiques et identitaires perçus par ces parents lorsque vient le temps d’inclure une langue signée au sein de l’environnement familial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTIPA Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langageSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207