MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2901713155

The effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant on endotoxin-induced cytokine secretion in human myometrial cells

2017· dissertation· W2901713155 on OpenAlexaff
Bona Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2017
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactobacillus rhamnosusSecretionMicrobiologyCytokineLactobacillusBiologyChemistryImmunologyEndocrinologyBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prophylactic administration of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant (GR1SN) was shown to prevent lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced preterm birth (PTB) in mice by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in uterine tissues in vivo. The aim of this thesis is to elucidate the effects of GR1SN in human myometrial cells in vitro, where I hypothesize it will suppress LPS-induced cytokine secretion. Here I demonstrate that PBS-based GR1SN contains protein moieties that induce endotoxin tolerance-like phenotypes in myometrial cells to suppress secretion of pro-inflammatory factors following LPS stimulus. The observed effects are unique to a GR1SN-myometrial cell interaction, and cannot be replicated using supernatant derived from non-GR-1 lactobacilli species. However, in vivo, GR1SN-PBS does not delay the onset of LPS-induced PTB in pregnant CD-1 mice under the experimental conditions used. Through this project, I have highlighted the unique capacity of protein moieties secreted by L. rhamnosus GR-1 to inhibit inflammatory signals in human myometrial cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→